Flutter vs .NET MAUI: A Comparative Analysis

In the world of mobile app development, choosing the right framework can spell the difference between a stellar application and a mediocre one. Two such frameworks that have made a mark recently are Flutter, backed by Google, and .NET MAUI, a product from Microsoft. Both of these frameworks aim to provide developers with the tools necessary to build cross-platform apps with ease, but they come with their own set of features and distinctions. Here, we will delve deep into the differences between Flutter and .NET MAUI.



Introduced by Google, Flutter is an open-source UI software development toolkit. It's used for developing natively compiled applications for mobile, web, and desktop from a single codebase. Dart is the primary language used in Flutter.


Stands for ".NET Multi-platform App UI". It's a part of the .NET 6 evolution and an evolution of Xamarin.Forms. .NET MAUI allows developers to create apps that run on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows with a single codebase. C# is the primary language here.

Key Differences:

1. Programming Language:

  • Flutter: Uses Dart, a language created by Google. Dart is still gaining traction, meaning developers might need to learn it from scratch.
  • .NET MAUI: Employs C#, a widely-accepted language in the software development realm, known for its versatility and robustness.

2. Performance:

  • Flutter: Known for high performance due to its Skia graphics engine. The UI remains consistent across platforms since everything, from buttons to animations, is drawn from its graphics engine.
  • .NET MAUI: Relies on the platform's native controls, ensuring that the look and feel match the native guidelines. This might make integration smoother but may not guarantee absolute UI consistency.

3. Component Library & Ecosystem:

  • Flutter: Provides a rich set of highly customizable widgets, which can replicate native components' look and feel. The Flutter package ecosystem is growing rapidly.
  • .NET MAUI: Inherits the extensive library of Xamarin.Forms, and since it's a part of the broader .NET ecosystem, it has access to a plethora of NuGet packages.

4. Development Experience:

  • Flutter: Offers 'Hot Reload', enabling developers to instantly view the result of the latest changes.
  • .NET MAUI: Also supports hot reload and comes with the robustness of the Visual Studio IDE, offering a comprehensive development environment.

5. Community and Support:

  • Flutter: Being a product of Google, Flutter has quickly garnered a large community. The frequency of updates and improvements is notable.
  • .NET MAUI: Benefits from the vast .NET and Xamarin community. Microsoft's backing ensures consistent updates and professional support.

6. Integration and Extensions:

  • Flutter: Has plugins to integrate with Firebase and other Google services. Other third-party integrations might require more effort.
  • .NET MAUI: Seamlessly integrates with Azure and other Microsoft services. Also, being a part of .NET, it can make use of existing libraries and tools.


Both Flutter and .NET MAUI come with their strengths and are tailored to cater to specific needs. The choice largely depends on the developer's familiarity with the programming languages, the required app performance, and the target platform. Both frameworks are capable of delivering high-quality, cross-platform applications. Making a decision involves considering the project requirements, future scalability, and the resources at hand.